雜論本土

由於D100工作太忙,所以我完全無時間去寫blog,依家開始時間會正常番啲,加上時局大亂,我覺得應該寫番多啲嘢。

作為港獨論述的第一批提倡者,我對依家嘅本土論述非常搖頭,特別有部分人嘅講嘢方法,真係令人懷疑佢地係嚟主張本土,定嚟拆檔。但對我呢嚟講,近排啲本土論述出咗一啲問題:

1. 喺認同香港係主要家園嘅前提下,左右各派係可以兄弟登山,各自努力,唔會郁吓鬧人左膠或者話人地騎劫運動。如果講騎劫,一直以國民黨人自居嘅黃毓民,遠比香港班左膠可疑一百倍。國民黨對台灣本土運動嘅鎮壓,以及反對分離主義係眾所周知。所以如果我真係鬧人假本土,我第一個郁黃毓民。

2. 好似戴高樂號召法國民眾對抗納粹德國統治,當時亦有唔少法共成員參與抗戰,甚至之後佢地仍然十分之支持戴高樂(儘管唔同意戴高樂偏右主張),所以大部分「左膠」我係唔會打,佢地有部分仲係捍衛香港本土文化有功。真係要打,係好似曾志豪呢挺經常打壓香港人嘅人。有部分所謂本土派,例如黃洋達,我想問佢條友喺天星、皇后捍衛戰裡面去咗邊?捍衛本土文化,D&G事件呢類捍衛本土尊嚴嘅人固然重要,但天星、皇后捍衛香港文化歷史係一樣重要。林輝至少曾經綁住自己喺天星碼頭,勇武過阻拆,唔係有啲人,日日鬧人鳩坐,自己就去土共大本營新光戲院搞show抽佔領中環水。

3. 以香港現實政治論,本土論述主要反中,但唔會反美、反英,特別英美屬長期盟友,親英派更無理由去反美。正如民進黨依家都係親美,新加坡人民行動黨更加唔駛講,當年李光耀喺被踢出馬來西亞聯邦果陣,最關注正係英軍留喺當地幾耐。論華夏文化第一威脅,肯定係俄羅斯,美國唔係無份,日本、韓國文化加速字母化係美國人壓力。但隨住美國本身文化種族多元越做越好,佢地越無必要咁做,美國今日官方都用正體中文,相反,中共係師承蘇共。

我認為講本土係必要,但講本土講到飄移龍門,呢個係倒米。所以我有必要出嚟以正視聽。

5 thoughts on “雜論本土

  1. 就算香港垃圾會班民主派議員變晒本土派, 香港人ge利益都係守唔住, 因為依家選舉方法同議會點票方法係唔會俾民主派係香港有作為.

    如果香港人爭取唔到真普選,要守住本土有限資源,我愚見認為獨立係唯一出路, 回歸英國或者中華民國都唔係上策. 不過白香港人可能要借英國或台灣同美國去幫香港獨立.

  2. Martin:
    睇完你篇文,心中有幾個問號,希望您可以解釋下,如果唔係,我唔能夠完全理解你篇文。
    (1)您可唔可以簡單地解釋「港獨」同「本土」嘅異同之處;因為如果大家唔清楚呢兩個terms喺您定義下嘅分別,根本就唔會明白點解您「非常搖頭」;
    (2)您講嘅「本土」,又同陳雲嘅城邦論支持者講嘅本土,有乜野異同。
    我問這兩個問題,係因為陳雲嘅城邦論已經有去都著書立說嘅地步,大家肯睇書會明白(當然,您可以唔同意佢嘅理論)。不過,您提出既兩個terms,即係「港獨」同「本土」,在坊間並未見到有比較完整嘅敘述。因此,當您篇文章(尤其是開端及結尾嘅第三點)用上呢啲terms嘅時候,部份讀者(例如我)會害怕誤解您嘅意思。

  3. Martin,

    Why these years Hong Kong politics full of arguements within and lacking Regional or Global understandings. Diplomatic Missions station in Hong Kong may feel funny after reading and viewing all translated material of arguements of Hong Kong politics.

  4. 本土又好大中華又好,如果走火入魔到自以為教主領袖,鍵盤打飛機指點地獄,咁就只會害人害物,無濟於事。

  5. We miss you Martin, welcome back and a great return blog post at that as well.

    I too think some of these 本土 figures are getting increasingly ridiculous. I stopped following a certain Taoist priest on Facebook for some time as his comments were getting more and more over the top. Which is a pity as I loved his books on the Chinese language, and his initial theories concerning how HK should be run.

    His “us vs them” siege mentality is sound only if he knows who his enemies are, but lately it no longer seems like he does anymore and he’s just abusing the doctrine to its most extreme “Islamist” style: “Anyone who doesn’t agree with me is a ‘lefty plastic’ heretic.”

    It seems Wong Yuk-man’s every single venture, be it business or politics, always ends in crashing failure. He reminds me of Ozawa Ichiro in Japan, who started out as an idealistic reformer, brought enough followers with him to form a credible opposition to the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, but then his ego got in the way, always butting in whenever his successors (elected by members of his own parties) don’t follow his whims, and then promptly breaks up said party with his core followers. The rest is history and he’s more or less irrelevant now.

    As for Wong Yeung-tat, he’s an opportunistic c*** not fit to lick the shoes of true Hong Kongers like Gary Fan. That is all.

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *