東日本大地震一週年

今日喺東日本大地震一週年,一年前小弟呢一刻,喺東京大手町皇居外面,十五十六入唔入番高樓大廈。

日本人嘅恢復能力,我一直都相信。但福島縣嘅災民,到今日生活都未能正常,可能一世都唔能夠重返家園。呢個已經唔係天災,係人禍。係東京電力公司,同過往嘅執政自民黨政府搞出嚟嘅蘇州屎。東京嘅繁榮,並唔係福島縣民享受,但要福島縣民離開家園作為代價,乜合理咩?乜合乎社會公義咩?

祝福日本係重要,作為親歷呢次災劫嘅外國人,我亦鼓勵大家去日本消費,協助振興當地經濟。日本人唔係要捐贈,而係拼搏嘅機會。但更重要,係反對核電,喺有可能受海嘯威脅嘅國家,沿岸唔應該再有核電廠,呢個係重要。因為核電出事,代價係子子孫孫要償付,我地俾唔起呢個繁榮代價。

台灣、香港、廣東沿岸、日本都應該係時候停止發展核電,夠喇。人類並唔係無其他能源可以取代。


9 thoughts on “東日本大地震一週年

  1. 昨日參加了一個Symposium on One Year after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident,日本教授分析了整個事件,內容長盡。台灣吸收了福島的經驗提出的設計也很好。但大陸決定繼續發展,只說在法律法規加強及同國際接軌。香港的Daya Bay Contingency Plan就更差。
    Hong Kong Nuclear Society (HKNS)和城大之後會邀請政府有關部門講解。
    如有興趣,可到我的網誌中看。聽大會說所有講稿之後會在網上發放。

  2. I’m surprised you were in Otemachi at that time…I was at Nihonbashi at my 5F office…the shakes were very intense…that night I had to stay at a public stadium since all transportations were stopped…the things you mentioned were absolutely right…many people in Hong Kong are quite Japanophilic and believe Japan has the best of all…the truth is Japan has all traits of issues that are similiar to other Asian societies…corruptions, bureaucracies, unjust business and social practices. Yet unlike you, I’m less optimistic…Japan will still be very important trading and “soft power” nation for a prolonged period of time, but eventually it is destined to be much more fringe position…just like the path of Portugal, at the very other end of Eurasia, in this 300-400 years, went through.

  3. I’m surprised you were at Otemachi at that time…I was at Nihonbashi at my 5F office…the shakes were very intense…that night I had to stay at a public stadium since all transportations were stopped…the things you mentioned were absolutely right…many people in Hong Kong are quite Japanophilic and believe Japan has the best of all…the truth is Japan has all traits of issues that are similiar to other Asian societies…corruptions, bureaucracies, unjust business and social practices. Yet unlike you, I’m less optimistic…Japan will still be a very important trading and “soft power” nation for a prolonged period of time, but eventually it is destined to be at a much more fringe position…just like the path of Portugal, at the very other end of Eurasia, in this 300-400 years, went through.

  4. 台灣、香港、廣東沿岸、日本都應該係時候停止發展核電,夠喇。人類並唔係無其他能源可以取代。

    我唔同意你呢一句. 如果你有讀過一本叫 “Long Emergency” 既書, 入面講到所有再生能源 (水力, 風力, 太陽能…) 都需要用石油去為原材料加工 (e.g. 製造太陽能板, 製造風車既配件)…….如果日本要改變提供電力既方式, 佢地最好快D 起步, 想下用咩方法取締核能, 而家既石油儲藏量最多可能捱 50 年, 你想下佢地50 年內起唔起得切 ?

    呢本書又提到目前地球仍然有足夠核原料作為發電用途, 可能夠用一個世紀。核能既問題眾所周知, 係日本呢D地方更加危險, 但係, 我覺得日本短期內冇得揀, 係佢地未起好再生能源設施之前, 佢地唔用核能就冇野可以用, 唔通學中國燒煤?

  5. To: Jay Yoshikawa

    Portugal is not the wealthiest nor the most advanced country in Europe, and it is recently deeply affected by the economic crisis, just like Spain and Greece. However, it is still a wonderful country. Together with Brazil, Portugese language and culture will still be an important part of the world.

    It is better to be a country culturally strong, a country which values humanity, rather than a country that is prosperous but ruthless. I would say that Japan will be relatively stable and peaceful for the next 50 years, while China may still go through bumpy reforms and revolts and the worst scenario of civil wars may also happen in near future.

  6. 我都非常反對核電,除左佢嘅風險代價太高之外,某尐國家更家以核電廠作為掩飾,出師有名咁去儲藏核原料作軍事用途,威脅其他國家。但以現代需求嘅角度黎講,暫時好難搵到一種再生能源去代替核能,就算現在有科學家成功用核聚變(聲稱遠比核裂變安全)能量去發電,但要全面取代,冇三四十年嘅時間係做唔到。

    而家根本係洗濕左個頭,唯一方法係教育大家點樣用少尐能源,減低消耗。

  7. michigan_8_mile_road:其實一年前都討論過,就算用核能,其原料都係要用化石能源推動嘅機器發掘及提煉,而且係on-going,唔似得風力、太陽能等只係喺製造及安裝嘅過程會用到化石能源,係one-off。

    不過的而且確,風力、太陽能喺發電功率/平方公尺數字仲係太低。但地熱能嘅效率,用今時今日嘅技術,係可以同核能比。日本呢個溫泉國用地熱能係絕對優勢,但實在唔明白地熱能喺日本嘅應用係非常之少。一年前都講過,呢方面日本實在應該向菲律賓學習。

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *