你估英國大臣學蘇錦樑咁做有乜結果?

我唔敢擔保其他副局長或政治助理會睇我呢個潮語多到爆嘅博客,不過作為IT界別的麻煩友之一,蘇錦樑副局長有睇呢個落重咖喱、辣椒嘅博客就唔出奇。

我可以講,如果佢做英國的副大臣,諗住一句Sorry可以過骨就真係太傻太天真。

The Guardian: Jacqui Smith apologises for try claim back cost of family’s TV package

內政大臣嘅老公,喺酒店睇鹹片,佢兩公婆點增加性趣,小弟唔想知,不過如果將鹹片嘅支出都由納稅人去俾,英國人就追到你瘦為止,依家Jacqui Smith被呢單支出醜聞搞到一頭煙,仲有硬膠蘇格蘭場高層,竟然將一份拉恐怖分子的file cover被記者映到,搞到要提早拉人,兩單膠到無朋友嘅事件被全英國人窮追猛打,睇嚟Jacqui Smith遲早連大臣都無得做。

在英國睇兩套鹹片,已經搞到咁大鑊,蘇錦樑副局長用政府卡片申請外傭事件,香港人對佢實在太客氣,由得佢講Sorry就算,如果在英國,呢單嘢唔日日被反對黨用嚟恥笑又恥笑就奇喇。

一句講晒,無全民普選,香港的各類膠官會繼續濫用特權,香港有ICAC都無用。

4 thoughts on “你估英國大臣學蘇錦樑咁做有乜結果?

  1. He is too stupid to use his name card as supporting documents. He has no political knowledge to be in his position. (Same as Leung Kam Chung Anthony)

    A bank officer would not need any proof to support a credit card application in his own bank. He thinks that he works for the Government and same rules should apply to him.

    Although his salary proof is publicly known, he should write to the Director of Immigration to apply for a waiver of documents. Or he should go through Civil Services Bureau to lodge such application and obtain waiver.

  2. 如此官威,簡直比內地的更大、更氣焰。無法無天!
    而蘇錦樑的解釋根本毫無誠意、絕無悔意。入境處的解釋就更加是官官相衛,欲蓋彌張。
    這件事給副局長蘇錦樑與及入境處輕易含混過去,即代表香港的依法辦事已經死亡。人治!
    絕對不能夠輕易讓此事含混過去,否則成為 “案例” ,將來香港的法治更凍過水。

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *