話人錯之前,唔該睇下自己有無寫錯

股海窮庭:是U盤的錯?還是神話的錯?(2009/03/13)

雖然小弟都長期睇淡HSBC,但睇淡還睇淡,HSBC一眾散戶被人當眾屈機,當人肉提款機,仍然要為佢地伸張正義。你自己點睇個市一件事,唔代表你可以俾其他人屈機。

但有些股膠,這次U盤之亂即時露底,脫苦海呢位土共,只係識指責HSBC散戶睇錯市,對U盤背後的監管問題隻字不提,為咗幫政府不負責任到在受害者傷口上灑鹽,佢都算夠過份,但佢對U盤嘅認識更加令人恥笑:

自3月2日起,以匯豐為題的分析鋪天蓋地,而最戲劇性的一幕是3月9日最後一秒最後一手承了$33.00,只比供股價高出15%,電視瑩幕出現灑淚場面,煞是感人!可是翌日一開市就承$37.25,最低也有$37.00,似乎只有該手$33.00有利可圖。原來全香港人只為那$13,200而驚而哭,但明知是假,又為何喊驚?

脫苦海先生,閣下好歹都出過本書教人炒股票,唔知閣下教人炒股票,講所謂「股海秘辛」前,有無update過自己,定係學某啲風水佬,連羅庾都唔識用,就學人幫人睇風水?睇下Closing Auction Session中,收市價係點訂:

「於16:10,港交所系統會按買賣盤類、價格及落盤次序等按序對盤,並釐定「參考平衡價格(IEP)」。參考平衡價格是指在最高與最低競價限價買賣盤中,可以達成最高交易股數的買盤價或賣盤價。」

因為中文好多時寫財經嘢寫到一頭霧水,我引英文的定義,因為英文夠晒清楚:

「Indicative Equilibrium Price (IEP) is the price at which the maximum number of shares can be traded if matching occurs at that time.」

請留意,係最高交易股數,maximum number of shares,而唔係舊有四點鐘準時收市制度,以收市前最後五個按盤價(Nominal Price)嘅中位數決定,係以Volume嚟決負,唔係喺度玩Musical Chair遊戲,有個黐線嘅一手33.00盤搞亂大市,否則就唔會咁多人投訴有大戶玩左手交右手遊戲,因為係要手上貨夠多,錢又多,又玩開場外衍生工具交易果啲友仔,至會可以咁樣屈機。呢啲人仲好意思扮晒財經專家,對港交所嘅責任隻字不提,呢啲咁嘅財經博客,睇得多真係隨時睇壞腦。睇壞腦都唔緊要,如果咁樣而破財,呢堆博客同啲財經演員一樣,係唔會為閣下嘅損失負責。

後話:大家一向認識小弟都係政治學或電腦果面嘅人,我自己研究Finance係因幫屋企做生意,侷住要學。但Finance同Computer,以至Economics一樣,中文書或者文章好多時寫到亂晒籠,大家一頭霧水,唔清唔楚,小弟勸各位,如果學Finance,最好自己睇英文書。

再後話:根據本博紀錄,呢位博主去年煽動網民去搞陳巧文

http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/tokuhon_blog/article?mid=1938

今日被人篤爆寫股票寫到錯晒,立即連出九條comments發爛渣,仲未計Brian Indian Chung呢件茂利,土共嘅質素就係咁低。 不過,呢度anti-spamming功能一流,慢慢打喇。

4 thoughts on “話人錯之前,唔該睇下自己有無寫錯

  1. 附加娛樂:股海窮庭支持者的IP及Email

    Author : Queen (IP: 220.246.173.166 , n220246173166.netvigator.com)
    E-mail : [email protected]
    URL :
    Whois : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=220.246.173.166
    Comment:
    BNO平權是否已”香左”一大截?

    Author : Queen (IP: 220.246.173.166 , n220246173166.netvigator.com)
    E-mail : [email protected]
    URL :
    Whois : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=220.246.173.166
    Comment:
    人地英國佬當你地傻仔咋

    ====

  2. It is sad when some of these financial bloggers go into politics and incite hatred and bigotry.

    I once visited this financial blogger during the Tiber crisis a year ago, for some reason, he managed to conclude that democracy is bad for you. I was horrified to see all the comments agreeing with him.

    I decided to set the record straight and tried to reason with him, but it was a big mistake, as this idiot, instead of trying to debate sensibly, simply threw insults at me and questioned why I used an English username instead of a Chinese one. WTF man?

    I left that place in disgust and swore never to go back there again.

    “土共嘅質素就係咁低” – I 1000% agree.

    On the bright side, not all financial bloggers are like that, or at least they don’t get involved in politics.

  3. 我稱這名脫苦海做股膠,因為香港有不少自以為識炒股的人,查實沒有在財務學上下過苦功,只是識執財經演員口水尾就以為識財經。小弟係寫過財經評論(其中一個筆名唔方便講,另一個筆名係周向紅,分析製藥股,但好耐以前的事,因為寫一篇財經分析,要係時事評論四倍時間同數據分析),但我只敢寫我叫做熟果三項:銀行及融資、資訊科技以及製藥。所以你唔見我在金、銀、外匯等賣弄。(至於定息票據太冷門,我估可能得我ex-gf一個讀者,而且她專過我。)

    若論真係夠專業的財經博客,小弟是高度推薦港燦,唔計他寫同燦嫂之間的浪漫故事(應該去拍成電影),你可以看到,佢真係行家嚟。仲有係禢中怡中環博客,同埋孫柏文金手指。

    財經博客唔寫政治係okay,依家要搞到鬧爆政府,皆因監管太爛。

  4. 土共的質素就是這樣低。最近我在雅虎和民建聯的走狗秦月辯論,問他中共的過失,他永遠是迴避問題(一係不停指責筆者沒有批評外國),搞到我不想和這條粉腸辯論,因為在浪費時間。

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *