五毛黨-五毛

對付 五毛 與防衛民主

五毛 成日有一個謬論,華人好易中招,就係當佢地要被ban果陣,就用言論自由作為擋箭牌,你郁佢,就老屈你獨裁,無言論自由,雙重標準。呢啲情況,我真係遇得太X多,遇到自己都有啲厭嘅程度,我呢度一次過覆呢啲友仔。

五毛 反對民主就無言論自由

喺德國刑法第86條 (§ 86 u. 86a StGB,大家可能日後成日睇到§符號,喺德國引用法律條文要有呢個符號),展示違憲組織旗幟,如果唔係作教學研究、藝術等用途,係犯法,包括納粹黨同ISIS(DAESH),點解要咁做,因為呢啲組織嘅目的,其實係摧毀民主制度,不論以種族為理由,定宗教為理由,請問以摧毀民主為職志嘅人,點解要俾佢利用民主權利大放厥詞,要捍衛異見者發言權利,好明顯唔適合反對民主嘅人妖言惑眾。所以,我一向對五毛都係ban人ban得手起刀落就係咁解,如果純粹異見,我可以辯論,但五毛嚟搗亂達致佢嘅目的,呢個係另一回事,我並無責任提供俾五毛任何搵食場所,所以呢度嘅五毛黨政策,亦特別凶狠。

有人就ECHR作出上訴,但ECHR嘅判詞都寫得好清楚,就係如果為捍衛民主社會所需,言論自由係可以受限

Freedom of expression is one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of the basic conditions for its progress and for each individual’s self‑fulfilment. Subject to Article 10 § 2, it applies not only to ‘information’ or ‘ideas’ that are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb. Such are the demands of pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness without which there is no ‘democratic society’. As set forth in Article 10, this freedom is subject to exceptions, but these must be construed strictly, and the need for any restrictions must be established convincingly.

但關鍵係民主社會,依家 五毛 係受聘於一個獨裁政權,破壞關乎民主嘅正常討論,你覺得五毛有言論自由。當然有啲五毛攞德國做擋箭牌,攞嚟限制港獨係黐線,尋求自決同獨立係公民權利,係唔應該妨礙呢類言論,但五毛係乜,都係果句,五毛都係支持一個獨裁政權,點解要俾權利你去破壞其他人嘅權利,達致你嘅私人目的?

所以喺防衛民主嘅前提下,對付五毛係必須絕不手軟,無退讓空間可言。

One thought on “對付 五毛 與防衛民主

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *