雀巢的面皮可以同中國政府一拼

「Nestlé has a very close relationship with its milk producers in China and advises them continuously on the quality of milk production. Nestlé also has the same stringent quality control system in place in its factories in China as in any other part of the world. Over 70 different tests are routinely conducted in the course of producing infant formula and other milk products. In fact, the Chinese authorities have issued official certificates for all tested Nestlé products stating that no melamine has been detected in any of them.

In general terms, melamine is found throughout the food chain across the world in minute traces which do not represent any health risk for consumers. There is a generally accepted tolerable daily intake of melamine in food in the EU (0.5mg/kg of body weight/day) and in the US (0.63mg/kg of body weight/day). The lowest level of melamine traces which can be measured by commonly-used testing equipment (2 ppm) is 20 times below these internationally-recognised safety limits. In other words, based on this 2 ppm value, a three year-old child would have to consume over 40 litres of milk every day to exceed these safety limits.

Since the safety of consumers is of utmost importance to the company, Nestlé once again expresses confidence that none of its products in China is made from milk adulterated with melamine.」

佢有confidence一回事,依家政府同蘋果日報發現三聚氰胺係鐵一般嘅事實。雀巢厚顏無恥的結果,就係全香港人罷食任何雀巢產品到呢間公司肯道歉為止!

以為自己係大財團就可以唔負責任,大晒呀?

雀巢英文原裝聲明

One thought on “雀巢的面皮可以同中國政府一拼

  1. 對於毒奶事件,盲目愛國者有以下兩個「論點」,來支持「中國毒奶雖然問題嚴重但值得諒解」的觀點:

    論點1. 某些奶類產品的三聚氰胺含量合乎安全標準,因此無需驚慌(彷彿在暗示傳媒小題大做)。

    論點2. 很多東西都有三聚氰胺。(不知道他們口中的「東西」是什麼,也不知道他的數據及判斷的根據是什麼,也不知道他們的推論過程是什麼,但他們卻想強烈暗示,奶有三聚氰胺也不出奇。)

    就第一個論點而言,含量合不合乎安全標準,是一個偽問題,因為我們不會因為安全,在煮菜時刻意在食物上加一些本來就不需要的工業用原料。好好的一杯奶,為何要增加一個本來就不存在的健康風險呢? 不如我們再在奶中滲入更多其他的工業用原料吧,只要含量安全就行了。
    其次,奶含有三聚氰胺的背後是意味著什麼呢? 是意味著有人為了規避蛋白質測試而做假嗎? 這是一個誠信問題。是意味著製造過程出了問題嗎? 這就是一個質量監管的問題。是意味著生態污染嗎? 這就是一個環境問題。這些問題都需要我們去正視及解決的。

    至於論點2,因為完全唔成point,因此難以回應了。我們只好反問他們:「對呀,很多東西都含三聚氰胺,例如產自中國的奶就有,不過外國的奶卻沒有。世上真是無奇不有!」

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *