譚偉豪為了政治,不惜破壞政治中立傳統

Dear CSEAA Members,

On behalf of the CSEAA Executive Committee, I would like to inform you that the Executive Committee of CSEAA has passed the resolution basically Unanimously (7 Support, 0 Against, 2 Abstain from voting) for CSEAA to support Dr. Samson Tam Wai Ho on his participation to the 2008 Legislative Council IT Functional Constituency Election on 7-Sep-2008.

Dr. Tam graduated from the CUHK in 1986 majored in Electronics an minored in Computer Science. He is a member of CSEAA.

The Executive Committee has made the above resolution because the Alumni Association always recommends and supports our members to serve the community and to contribute to the development of the IT Industry, which would benefit to the Hong Kong economy as well as to our alumni. Dr. Tam has also actively support the events of the Alumni Association.

Dr. Tam grown up in Hong Kong as well as getting his bachelor and doctorship in Hong Kong. He is one of the local pioneer entrepreneurs in the IT industry, who had successfully listed his local technology company (Group Sense Limited) in our HK Stock Exchange in the early 90s. These local pioneer entrepreneurs had made important contributions to the initial blooming of the local industry. Samson has got chairmanship and council membership of a number of major IT professional organizations/associations as well as sitting in a number of government consultative committees. He is also a Trustee of the United College of CUHK. So, we have no double to support Dr. Tam to be elected as the Legislative Councilor on the IT Functional Constituency as our representative to pursue the development of the IT industry.

====
以上英文信件,是剛由其他中大校友交給我,看了之後,非常痛心。

如果譚偉豪認為真的是IT是主角,怎會HKIRC的事件,用根本不明來歷的資料來抹黑;如果譚偉豪認為真的IT是主角,何以不惜要破壞校友會政治中立傳統,仍要繼續蠻幹下去。

我個人呼籲,CSEAA校友站出來,要求校友會繼續中立,收回所謂的支持。我可以說,此例一開,中大各大校友會將永無寧日,不幸矣。

6 thoughts on “譚偉豪為了政治,不惜破壞政治中立傳統

  1. 剛看過CSEAA校友會的會章,好似無話要政治中立。CSEAA校友會支查持自己的會員參選好正常呀,點會永無寧日呢。係貴BLOG攪到CSEAA永無寧日就真

    網主公布IP:220.246.198.69

  2. To 譚生打手:

    原來會章無話唔做得,就乜都得。校友會原來可以代表晒所有政見不同的校友,支持某位候選人的嘅,乜歪理嚟?

  3. CSEAA校友會幹事會係會員一人一票選出來,當然可以代表校友發言。如果D會員唔滿意,大可以下屆唔選舉地。這就是民主力量。如果閣下係CSEAA校友,大可下屆出來選做幹事會為CSEAA會員做返D野。仲有我唔係譚生打手,只係不值貴BLOG謝題發揮攪到CSEAA永無寧日JE。

    220.246.198.69

  4. 又係土共老招數,屈人搞事,永無寧日。

    我可以講,你呢挺人真係令中大校友組織永無寧日,CSEAA開先例的代價,就係其他校友組織,都會被政黨大舉污染干預,一如業主立案法團。

    多位中大校友組織成員,都明顯不會同意你呢挺搞亂檔的看法。

    還有,我先旨警告,下次留email同website,請用番你真實的email同website,再盜用莫乃光的,我可以根據選舉法例向選管會舉報,特別你用香港IP。

  5. The resolution of CSEAA 常務委員會 to support Dr Tam in this election might not be valid as it is extraordinary to consider politics as 日常會務 (See 7.3 of CSEAA Constitution at http://www.cseaa.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=27). According to the Constitution, “會員大會由全體會員組成,為本會最高權力組織”. Without the resolution of a proper 會員大會, the above support by CSEAA might have violated the Guidelines issued by EAC.

    Members of CSEAA may consider complain to Mr Justice Pang Kin-kee, Chairman of EAC urgently and disclose such story to the media!

  6. CSEAA has been deleted from the list of Dr Tam’s supporters at his election website!!

    Any comment from “CSEAA Member”??

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *